Target
BarthHaas describes it as elderflower, caramel, tobacco, sage, plum.
- Smells like
- Elderflower, Caramel, Tobacco, Herbal, Stone fruit
- Bitterness
- High (8β13.5% alpha)
- Swap it for
- Agnus Β· compare them β
Brewing values
Alpha acid
8β13.5% typical 10.8
2 sources, spread of 5.5%
- Hopsteiner8β13Data sheet last changed 2020-01-09.
- BarthHaas8.5β13.5Range over the last 4 crop years.
Beta acid
4β5.7% typical 4.9
2 sources, spread of 1.7%
- Hopsteiner4.5β5.5Data sheet last changed 2020-01-09.
- BarthHaas4β5.7Range over the last 4 crop years.
Cohumulone
35β37% of alpha typical 36
1 source, spread of 2% of alpha
- Hopsteiner35β37Data sheet last changed 2020-01-09.
Total oil
1.2β1.8 mL/100g typical 1.4
2 sources, spread of 0.6 mL/100g
- Hopsteiner1.2β1.4Data sheet last changed 2020-01-09.
- BarthHaas1.2β1.8Range over the last 4 crop years.
Alpha to beta runs about 2.2:1, which is what governs how fast the bitterness fades in storage.
Oil composition
Not enough of this hop's oil is accounted for to show a breakdown. The sources on file name components totalling 59.9% of total oil β most of the balance is myrcene, which the source for this record doesn't publish. Rather than scale what's here up to 100% and invent the rest, here is only what was actually measured:
Aroma
What to swap it for
Scored on aroma overlap, oil composition and acid chemistry, then nudged up where a brewer has vouched for the swap by hand. An axis we haven't measured earns nothing, so a hop known only by its acid numbers caps out around 30 β the score is how much evidence there is for the swap, not just how close the numbers happen to be. Anything under 50 is a different beer, not a substitution.
Pedigree
Parentage unrecorded.
Notes on this record
purpose defaulted to dual, unconfirmed -- was not researched individually for this bulk scaffold pass. Correct before publishing.
For brewers and data folks: this hop as JSON Β· the source file